Among the world’s great powers, China is one of those which arguably are most difficult to assess with regard to ultimate political intentions. The difficulties were voiced by the United States Ambassador to China, Gary Locke, who noted “that there is a concern, a question mark, by people all around the world and governments all around the world as to what China’s intentions are.” China’s top leadership seldom reveals its internal decision-making, nor its chosen strategies, so an outside observer has to resort to various analytical devices to assess China’s intentions. These include but are not limited to a thorough analysis of the country’s national interests (if known or deducible), political statements (“signals”), political, military, and economic power as well as infrastructure (“capabilities”), and political actions such as the state’s decision to enter into or withdraw from binding international institutions, significant investment decisions, and in extreme cases military intervention abroad (“behaviour”).
Categories
Tags
Afghanistan
Ancient History
Azerbaijan
Britain
Caucasus
Central Asia
Chechnya
China
Defense against Terrorism
Denmark
Early Modern History
Energy
European Union
Extremism
Far East
Germany
Goths
Helion&Co
History
India
Intelligence
Iran
Islamic Extremism
Japan
Kazakhstan
Kyrgyzstan
Modern History
Norway
Organized Crime
Pakistan
Poland
Roman Empire
Russia
Scandinavia
Shanghai Cooperation Organization
Soviet Union
Sweden
Tajikistan
Technology
Terrorism
Turkey
Turkmenistan
United States
Uzbekistan
Xinjiang